Decoding Discontinuity

Decoding Discontinuity

The 11% Paradox - Why Orchestration Lock-In is Rewriting AI's Rules

Agentic Era Part 1 Revisited: How Mid-Year Data Supercharges Our Orchestration Thesis into a Lock-In Revolution

Raphaëlle d'Ornano's avatar
Raphaëlle d'Ornano
Aug 05, 2025
∙ Paid
11
1
Share
Credit: Planet Volumes

Despite model performance convergence and unprecedented ease of technical substitution, only 11% of enterprise builders switched AI providers in the past year. This striking statistic from Menlo Ventures' latest market data reveals a paradox that redefines our understanding of AI competition: switching is technically trivial but organizationally impossible. The explanation lies in the emergence of orchestration lock-in as the dominant force in AI markets.

Three months after publishing Part 1 of the Agentic Era series—where I first suggested orchestration as the new moat for LLMs—this empirical validation sharpens and extends our analysis in unexpected directions. In Part 1, I argued that the frontier AI race had shifted from model superiority to orchestration quality. The thesis was contrarian then—while the market still obsessed over benchmark scores and parameter counts, I emphasized the coordination layer between models and applications as the emerging source o…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Decoding Discontinuity to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Raphaëlle d'Ornano
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture